The second and third most
populous cities in America could be the next municipalities to
host Google’s gigabit Internet service provider, Fiber. The company announced that
they want to invite the cities of Chicago and Los Angeles to
explore the possibility of getting the hottest Internet service around.
They’re by far the largest cities yet considered by the fledgling ISP,
having previously come to just a single city with more than a million
residents (San Jose). The idea is likely to be received in Chicago and
LA much as it has been elsewhere: very, very well.
This is an important moment for the service, since it’s the first time Google has publicly considered going for the country’s most important urban centers. Not only does this represent a more powerful attack on the customer-base of competing ISPs, but it positions Fiber much more as a service to be desired. It’s one thing to not have some experimental thing you heard they’re getting out in Salt Lake City or something (no offense to anyone there), but quite another to have worse service than the residents of America’s big, trend-setting cities.
Los
Angeles, in particular, seems to pose a particularly strong opportunity
for Fiber to prove itself. It combines incredible population density in
some areas with enormous urban sprawl in others. It’s got a wide
variety of income levels, cultures, and languages. If Fiber can roll out
in Los Angeles, it should be able to do so just about anywhere.
Some have questioned whether Google (or Alphabet? I guess is still “Google Fiber” for now…) will be able to be successfully capture the market on a national scale. The idea is that since existing ISPs already have the people and businesses in place to roll out a fiber Internet service, and in many cases actually have fiber in the ground already, they will be able to adapt and out-price Google’s offering, or simply provide gigabit Internet more quickly as Google runs around ripping up miles and miles of urban pavement.
The
problem with this thinking is that it ignores how widely Google seems
to be interpreting the win conditions in the online space. Obviously,
the company would like to make oodles of money off of selling you the
Internet, and they’d like even more to control both the physical lines
of communication and the communication that goes on over those lines.
However, Google didn’t decide to get into the ISP game because it saw
the space as wide open and ripe for the picking, but because it saw the
space as decadent, uncompetitive, and totally unprepared to deliver the
services Google want stop deliver over the next decade or two.
In a very real way, if AT&T or anybody else does go on to “beat” fiber at its own game, Google will have won. The individual investors and stake holders who bet on Fiber in a particular city would be devastated, but the larger entity that is Google will have affected the change it was aiming to.
Check out the checklist Google has produced to determine whether a city is a good candidate for Fiber expansion.
This is an important moment for the service, since it’s the first time Google has publicly considered going for the country’s most important urban centers. Not only does this represent a more powerful attack on the customer-base of competing ISPs, but it positions Fiber much more as a service to be desired. It’s one thing to not have some experimental thing you heard they’re getting out in Salt Lake City or something (no offense to anyone there), but quite another to have worse service than the residents of America’s big, trend-setting cities.
Some have questioned whether Google (or Alphabet? I guess is still “Google Fiber” for now…) will be able to be successfully capture the market on a national scale. The idea is that since existing ISPs already have the people and businesses in place to roll out a fiber Internet service, and in many cases actually have fiber in the ground already, they will be able to adapt and out-price Google’s offering, or simply provide gigabit Internet more quickly as Google runs around ripping up miles and miles of urban pavement.
In a very real way, if AT&T or anybody else does go on to “beat” fiber at its own game, Google will have won. The individual investors and stake holders who bet on Fiber in a particular city would be devastated, but the larger entity that is Google will have affected the change it was aiming to.
Check out the checklist Google has produced to determine whether a city is a good candidate for Fiber expansion.
0 comments:
Post a Comment