Version numbers, schmersion numbers
You
may remember that between Windows 3 and Windows 7, Microsoft designated
each version with a name instead of a number: 95, 98, NT, Me, 2000,
Vista, and so on. When the company announced Windows 7, there was
actually a similar amount of disbelief; after a series of named versions
of Windows, it seemed odd to switch back to numbers.
There’s also the fact that the name of each Windows release doesn’t actually match the real
version number. For example, Windows 8.1 is actually version 6.3 of
Windows. Windows 10 is version 6.4. The last time the release name
actually matched the version number was the enterprise-focused Windows
NT 4.0, which was released back in 1996. Windows 2000, which was called
NT 5.0 during development, was actually version 5.0. Windows XP was
version 5.1. Windows Vista was 6.0, Windows 7 was 6.1, Windows 8 was
6.2, and Windows 8.1 is version 6.3.
Windows RT, which only ran Metro apps, was a new and separate beast, but it still sat on top of the core Windows NT kernel. That one is dead now.
Modern
versions of Windows are still based on the Vista kernel and code base —
including Windows 10, which is actually Windows 6.4. There will be some
confusion if (or when) we eventually reach internal version 7.0, but
we’ll cross that bridge when we get there.
Alternative theories for skipping Windows 9
An
ExtremeTech reader called Benny sent us an email to say that the number
9 is considered unlucky in Japan. Microsoft has a big enough presence
in Japan that it may have skipped Windows 9 to avoid any weirdness or
ill will. Benny says that Trend Micro — a Japanese company — did the
same thing a few years ago when it skipped version 9 of its antivirus
software.
Second, someone purporting to be a Microsoft developer posted this comment on Reddit:
As
insane as that hack sounds, it’s feasible that there are still plenty
of legacy Desktop apps that use this method (or something similar) to
check for Windows 95 or 98. Bear in mind that this is just an example
piece of code — some developers will check for the OS name (“Windows…”),
some will check for the version number (as discussed in the previous
section of this story), and some may use other methods entirely to find
out what OS the app is running on.
What’s in a name?
Ultimately, Windows
10 is just a name. Windows 9 probably would’ve made more sense — and
it’s always going to cause some grief with novice users who just don’t understand what happened to Windows 9. But Windows 10 isn’t any more right or wrong than calling Vista’s successor Windows 7.
Perhaps a better question to ask is why did Microsoft call it Windows 10 specifically,
and not something else? During the launch event (video embedded above)
Myerson gives us a few clues. Starting at around the 2:10 mark, he said
the following: “We know, based on the product that’s coming, and just
how different our approach will be overall, it wouldn’t be right to call
it Windows 9.” He then talks about how Windows One would make sense
with Xbox One, OneDrive, and OneNote, “but unfortunately Windows 1 has
been done by the giants that came before us.” And so it seems the only
other viable option was Windows 10.
Microsoft’s
seemingly arbitrary naming convention of Windows 10 is an interesting
one. It’s a strong-sounding version number — and it’s also a neat way of
distancing it from Windows 8, which Microsoft really wants to bury in
the living room couch cushions when no one is looking. In fact, this
may even be the same trick that Microsoft used to make us forget about
Vista: “Hey, with a name like Windows 7, it must be very different from
Vista.”
What
about any similarity to Apple’s Mac OS X? Apple did a similar thing,
after all: Its operating system versions steadily increased from System 1
through 7, then switched to Mac OS 8 and 9, and when it got to OS 10
(X) in 2001, it stopped altogether. We don’t think Microsoft is
intentionally copying Apple with Windows 10. But the marketing
department has to be aware of both the positive and
negative repercussions of wanting to ride on Apple’s coattails.
Finally,
given how Windows 10 is meant to be a single platform for just about
every form factor, plus the massive weight and importance that Microsoft
is lending to this release, we wouldn’t be surprised if it sticks
around for a long time — and Microsoft has made noises indicating it
wants to move to an ongoing, evolving OS without specific version numbers.
So
that’s it: Windows 10 is called Windows 10 because Microsoft says so —
even if “Windows” or “Windows X” would’ve been better. Check out our
continuing Windows 10 coverage for more information.
12/14/2015
Why is it called Windows 10 and not Windows 9?
Windows 10 is finally here —
and it’s been a long and winding road. Let’s step back for a moment and
address one of the most confusing things about the latest ersion of
Windows. When Microsoft announced its newest operating system last year,
the surprise was not that it was coming, but that Windows would be
skipping version 9 and heading straight to 10. When asked about Windows
10’s name, Microsoft never really gave a clear answer. So why, exactly,
did Windows 10 get the nod instead of 9?
Windows 8.1: Actually version 6.3, build 9600.
Why Windows 10 wasn’t called Windows One: “It has been done before” (by Bill Gates)
Apple’s OS X has been OS X for 14 years now — and shows no sign of being retired
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






0 comments:
Post a Comment